

April 7, 2007, 1:30 am
Posted by stephen in Catholic issues
According to John, Christ died on the cross at the exact moment when in the temples nearby, the lambs were being slaughtered for the Pascal feast. His death coincides with the sacrifice of the lambs. That however means that he died on the eve of Passover ... Most of the exegetes were of the opinion that John did not want to give us the exact, historic date of Christ’s death, but had instead chose a symbolic date to highlight the one profound truth: Jesus is the true Lamb of God who shed his blood for us.
- HH Pope Benedict XVI, sermon, 5 April 2007, Holy Thursday
Sources - Asia
News; Annunciations;
Whispers
in the Loggia [full sermon text]; Young
Fogeys
Fr Jay Toborowsky comments on his Young
Fogeys blog:
But something else in that Holy Thursday homily knocked me out, which I heard for the first time ever. There's always been a battle over whether the Last Supper took place on Passover night or the day before. ... Scholars tell us that, since Passover was always on a fixed date, there were times when it fell on the Sabbath, and then came the dilemma of which of God's mandated feasts do you keep (since one involves heavy work and one requires no work be done)? So in his homily, B16 tells of scholarly research that says that the people of Qumran (where the Dead Sea scrolls were found) would, in the case of the Passover and Sabbath collision, have their seders the day before, with all the froo-froo, but intentionally without a passover lamb. The implications of Jesus and the 12 apostles having such a seder are interesting. With no lamb on the their table, Jesus himself is the Lamb at that seder (adding a whole new profound depth to his command to eat his body and drink his blood).
I've been waiting years to hear
this most logical 14 Nisan crucifixion timing from a Catholic
priest. And now I hear it from the pope himself. I
always get given the 15 Nisan story. The explanation above
goes a long way to explain why the Wednesday
crucifixion theory of Herbert Armstrong is wrong, so ironically
it was Herbert Armstrong who was adamant that Jesus died on 14
Nisan.
That is the obvious time for Jesus to have died.
After all, Jesus death wasn't timed to coincide with the killing of
the lambs, nor was it meant to be approximate; the Passover lamb
sacrifice foreshadowed Jesus' death, and its original timing was
designed to coincide with Jesus' death.
Posted by Jared Olar
on
April 7, 2007, 2:52 am
Very
interesting. Of course as a former Armstrongist I was brought up
believing that Jesus died on Nisan 14 in the afternoon, and was
surprised to find that many (include Church Fathers, and I believe
Pope Leo the Great) said Jesus died on Nisan 15. I've never been able
to see how a Nisan 15 crucifixion could agree with what the four
Gospels say. Jesus' enemies wanted to make sure they did away with
Him before the festival began (Mark 14:2), but Nisan 15 is the first
day of the festival. And as Pope Benedict XVI said, St. John clearly
places the death of Jesus on Nisan 14, not Nisan 15. Many say that
St. John contradicts the Synoptics on that point, but I don't see it.
St. Mark places the Last Supper on "the first day of unleavened
bread, when they killed the Passover." The Passover lambs were
killed on Nisan 14, not Nisan 15. Thus, what St. Mark says agrees
with a placement of the Last Supper on the evening that commences
Nisan 14, the day the Passover lambs were killed. If I'm not
mistaken, Nisan 14 is the final day when leavened bread must be
disposed of, and so was sometimes termed a "day of unleavened
bread" even though the festival did not actually start until the
evening that commenced Nisan 15.
Then there is the concern
that Jesus and the robbers not be left on their crosses on the
Sabbath -- and that Sabbath, St. John said, was a "high day,"
and St. John says the day Jesus died was the Preparation Day for the
Passover, i.e., Erev Pesach, Nisan 14. Evidently that means the
Sabbath of that week was also the first day of the festival of
unleavened bread, i.e. Nisan 15.
We must also remember that
the annual festival days had almost as many rules as the weekly
Sabbath. It is simply impossible that the Jews would hold a legal
proceeding and an execution on Nisan 15, no matter what day of the
week that was.
Now, if it is true that the Essenes of Qumran
sometimes had their Passover Seders a day early, without lamb, then
that means it would not have been unheard of for Jews to have Seders
without lambs. That would explain why the disciples did not seem
surprised that Jesus had a Seder a night earlier than usual, without
a lamb (for, of course, He was the True Passover Lamb). It's also
interesting that Jesus gave His disciples directions for how to find
the Cenacle by telling them to follow a man carrying a large jar of
water -- we know the Essenes were even more devoted to ritual
ablutions and immersions than the Pharisees. Did Jesus make
arrangements for the Last Supper with an Essene, who would not object
to a Seder that was a day earlier than usual?