The Evidence for Christ from Secular
History
by Lane Rogers 

|
JESUS AND HISTORY |
"Christianity, far from being a philosophy or merely some ethical system, is pre-eminently a redemptive system. It is belief in Christ as the son of God who will redeem us from sin and raise us from the dead to an eternal judgment. Thus an investigation into the genuineness of the claims of the Christian religion must begin with the historical reality of Jesus, for apart from Jesus redemption from sin and a resurrection from the grave become mere "pie in the sky by and by."
|
The quote is originally from Ed Wharton's Case for Historic Christianity__We used some of his material for a starting point and we are thankful to him for his many years of hard work on this subject. |
I.
A SMALL SAMPLING OF THE EVIDENCE FOR THE HISTORICAL JESUS.
A.
FROM PAGAN SOURCES
1. Thallus. A Samaritan born historian named Thallus lived and worked in Rome about the middle of the first century. (c.52 A.D). Though his works are lost to us, Julius Africanus, a writer of the early third century, was familiar with Thallus' history of Greece. Africanus in commenting on the darkness which fell over the land during the crucifixion (Mark 15:33) said that, "Thallus, in the third book of his histories, explains away the darkness as an eclipse of the sun. " Will Durant observed that Thallus' argument took the existence of Christ for granted." The chief point in this reference to Thallus lies in the fact that a knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Jesus' death were well known in the imperial city of Rome as early as the middle of the first century. The fact of Christ's crucifixion was already common knowledge by that time, even to the extent that unbelievers like Thallus thought it necessary to explain the matter of the darkness as a natural phenomenon. But the never denied the darkness as a fact. The late Will Durant summed up the matter of Christ's historical existence by stating that it simply never occurred to the early opponents of Christianity to deny the existence of Jesus.
|
Early Christian use of Thallus Sextus
Julius Africanus was a Christian traveller and historian of the
late 2nd and early 3rd century AD. It is in his works Thallus is
mentioned.
"On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by and earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, "Thallus calls this darkness an eclipse of the Sun in the third book of his Histories, without reason it seems to me."
This is also mentioned by the 9th century Christian chronologer George Syncellus who cites Sextus Julius Africanus as writing in reference to the darkness mentioned in the synoptic gospels as occurring at the death of Jesus:
Africanus then goes on to point out that an eclipse cannot occur at Passover when the moon is full and therefore diametrically opposite the Sun.
In this brief statement Thallus refers to Jesus' crucifixion and we may ascertain that:
1. The Christian Gospel or at least an account of the crucifixion was known in the Mediterranean region by the middle of the first century AD. This brings to mind the presence of Christian teachings in Rome mentioned by Tacitus and Suetonius.
2. There was widespread darkness in the land, implied to have taken place at the time of Jesus' crucifixion.
3. Unbelievers offered rationalistic explanations for certain Christian teachings or for supernatural claims not long after their initial proclamation. |
2. Mara-Bar-Serapion. A manuscript in the British Museum preserves the text of a letter written some time after 73 AD. It was sent by a Syrian named Mara-Bar-Serapion to his son, Serapion. In prison at the time of the writing the father pleads for his son to be wise by illustrating the folly of persecuting such wise men as Socrates, Pythagoras, and Christ:
"What
advantage did the Athenians gain form putting Socrates to death?
Famine and plague came upon them as a judgment for their crime. What
advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a
moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews
gain from executing their wise king? It was just after that their
kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the
Athenias died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea; the
Jews ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion.
But Socrates did not die for good; he lived on in the teaching of
Plato. Pythagoras did not die for good; he lived on in the statue of
Hera. Nor did the wise King die for good; he lived on in the teaching
which he had given.
It is obvious that by the time of this
writing, Jesus was already placed on equal footing with the accepted
wise men of the ancient world.
|
A
Letter of Mara, Son of Serapion.1
|
1. From this letter we learn that Jesus was considered to be a wise and virtuous man.
2. He is addressed twice as the Jew's King, possibly a reference to Jesus' own teachings about Himself.
3. Jesus was executed unjustly by the Jews who paid (in part) for their misdeeds by suffering judgment shortly after (70 AD).
4. Jesus lived on in the teachings of early Christians which is an indication that Mara-Bar-Serapion was not a Christian.
5. The writer observed that the Destruction of Jerusalem was because the Jews killed the Christ, this from a pagan.
3.
Cornelius Tacitus.
Usually
rated as the greatest historian of Rome, Tacitus (born c. 52-54
A.D.). When he was about the age of sixty while writing on the reign
of Nero (54-68), told how the Christians were made scapegoats for the
Great Fire of 64 A.D. It has been rumored that Nero himself started
the fire in order to gain glory by rebuilding the city.
Here
is a full quote of the cite of our concern, from Annals
15.44.
Jesus and the Christians are mentioned in an account of how the
Emperor Nero went after Christians in order to draw attention away
from himself after Rome's fire of 64 AD:
|
"Such
indeed were the precautions of human wisdom. The next thing was to
seek means of propitiating the gods, and recourse was had to the
Sibylline books, by the direction of which prayers were offered to
Vulcanus, Ceres, and Proserpina. Juno, too, was entreated by the
matrons, first, in the Capitol, then on the nearest part of the
coast, whence water was procured to sprinkle the fane and image of
the goddess. And there were sacred banquets and nightly vigils
celebrated by married women. But all human efforts, all the lavish
gifts of the emperor, and the propitiations of the gods, did not
banish the sinister belief that the conflagration was the result
of an order. |
To
the pagan Tacitus, "Christus" was more than likely a proper
name. Tacitus was in a good position to learn of Christianity, being
governor of Asia in 112 A.D. However there are several things
we can know about Jesus from the above quote.
1. Christians
were named for their founder, Christus (from the Latin)
2.
Who was put to death by Roman procurator Pontius Pilate (also
Latin)
3. During the reign of emperor Tiberius (AD
14-37)
4. His death ended the "superstition" for a
short time.
5. But it broke out again (try Acts chapter
2)
6. Especially in Judaea, where the teachings had their
origin
7. His followers carried the doctrine to Rome (the
apostle Paul and company)
8. When the great fire destroyed a
large part of Rome during the reign of Nero (AD 54-68)
9.
Tacitus reports that this group was hated for its abominations
10.
These Christians were arrested after pleading guilty
11.
Many were convicted for the hatred of mankind
12. They were
mocked and then
13. Then tortured, including being "nailed
to crosses" or burnt to death
14. Because of these
actions, people had compassion for the Christians
15.
Tacitus therefore concluded that such punishments were not for the
public good but were simply "to glut one man's cruelty."
Since
Tacitus was a government official he no doubt received his material
from government records. It may have even been Pilate's letter to the
emperor. We should also not the historical context. The death of
Jesus is linked both to Pilate and Tiberius therefore confirming the
biblical account. One other point that should be noticed. Tacitus may
have referred to the resurrection of Jesus indirectly since he
mentioned that his teachings "again broke out" after his
death.
There is another reference to Jesus in the Histories
but the works are lost. The reference is preserved by Sulpicus
Severus. He informs us that Tacitus wrote of the burning of the
Jerusalem Temple by the Romans in 70 AD, an event that destroyed the
city. The "Christians" are mentioned as a group that are
connected with the event.
4. C. Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Younger). Pliny the governor of Bithynia, often wrote to the Emperor Trajan asking his Imperial advice on how best to deal with the sect of the Christians which according to him were troubling his province. One letter (c. 112 AD) reveals information he extracted from some Christians by torture:
|
Medieval
Sourcebook:
Pliny
the Younger was governor of Pontus/Bithynia from 111-113 AD. We
have a whole set of exchanges of his letters with the emperor
Trajan on a variety of administrative political matters. These two
letters are the most famous, in which P. encounters Christianity
for the first time. |
Ten books of Pliny's correspondence are extant today. The tenth book was written around 112 AD. In this book we notice that Pliny found that Christian influences were so strong that pagan temples had been nearly deserted, pagan festivals severely decreased and the sacrificial animals had few buyers. Because of the Christians inflexibility and the emperor's prohibition against political associations Pliny took action. Yet, he was not all that sure as to how he ought to deal with these people. Pliny wants to know if repentance should make any difference in how they are punished.
Pliny dealt with the Christians personally. He interrogated them wanting to know if they were believers. If they answered in the affirmative he asked them two more times under the threat of death. If they continued firm in their belief, he ordered the executed. It might also be mentioned that it is Pliny who gives the modern feminist movement their ammunition by referring to two women "deaconesses" who he arrested. Never mind that his theological understanding of these terms was completely absent even to the point of accusing those participating in the Lord's Supper of being cannibals. (They were eating flesh and drinking blood) I am sure that Pliny had a firm grasp on what is a deacon and elder in the church with his advanced theological background in Christianity. the term "deaconesses" simply means servants. Of course you realize that I am poking fun at those people who embrace such a silly idea.
If the person was a Roman citizen they were sent to the Emperor in Rome for trial. If they denied being a Christian or had disavowed their faith in the past they "repeated after me an invocation to the gods, and offered adoration...to YOUR IMAGE" (Trajan's image). Then they were allowed to "curse Christ." Pliny explained that the purpose of this was so that multitudes may be reclaimed from error.
Here are a few things we can learn from Pliny's letter:
1. Christ was worshiped as a deity by early believers.
2. Pliny refers late in his letter to the teachings of Jesus and His followers as "excessive superstition" and "contagious superstition." This reminds us of Tacitus and Suetonius.
3. Jesus' ethical teachings are reflected in the oath taken by Christians never to be guilty of a number of sins mentioned in the letter.
4. We find a probable reference to the institution of the Lord's Supper and the celebration of the "love feast," in Pliny's remark about their "regathering" to take common food. The reference here alludes to the accusation of the part of non-Christian believers that the believers were guilty of ritual murder and drinking blood during these meetings again, a veiled reference to the Lord's Supper.
5. There is also the mention that Christians meet on a "certain day" Was this Sunday?
6. We see Pliny's method of dealing with believers, from their identification, to their interrogation, to their execution.
7. Interestingly, Pliny reports that "true believers" could not be forced to worship the gods or the emperor!
8. Christian worship involved a "pre-dawn" service.
9. It included "singing hymns" and the early time meant there was a normal working day ahead.
10. Those Christians probably formed a typical cross-section of society in Bithynia since they were off all classes, races and sexes.
What we know from above is that believers were meeting on a regular basis and worshiping Jesus.
In Trajan's response we learn:
1. Christians should not be sought out or tracked down.
2. Repentance coupled with worship of the gods sufficed to clear a person. Pliny expressed doubts as to whether a person should be punished in spite of repentance and only recounts the pardoning of persons who had willingly given up their beliefs prior to questioning.
3. Pliny was not to honor any list of Christians which were given to him if the accuser did not name himself.
It is worth noticing in passing that the Emperor Trajan and the Emperor Hadrian both are reliable sources for the existence of early Christianity and its beliefs.
5.
Suetonius. During
the reign of Hadrian Suetonius was annalist and court official of the
Imperial House. About 120 AD he wrote his Life of Claudius, from
which is taken his most often quoted reference:
|
"As the Jews were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Christus, he expelled them from Rome." Nero 16 |
Since so many Jews had become Christians at Rome, Claudius probably equated the Jews with Christians and thus expelled them from Rome by Imperial decree. Luke, by the way records this same event much earlier in Acts 18:1-2. The second reference from Suetonius is again to the Christians who were tortured under Nero:
|
"After the great fire at Rome....Punishments were also inflicted on the Christians, a sect professing a new and mischievous religious belief. " |
There are a few facts that we can glean from Suetonius.
1. The first relates the the expulsion of the Jews from Rome but also relates to the claim that
2. It was Christ who caused the Jews to make the uproar in Rome, apparently by His teachings. The second reference is quite similar to the longer statement by Tacitus.
3. Including the use of the word "mischievous"
4. He uses the term "Christians" to identify this group as followers of Christ.
After referring to these same pagan writers as evidence of the historical Jesus, Will Durant says,
"These
references prove the existence of Christians rather than Christ; but
unless we assume the latter we are driven to the improbable
hypothesis that Jesus was invented in one generation; moreover, we
must suppose that the Christian community in Rome had been
established some years before 52 AD, to merit the attention of an
imperial decree.
This evidence especially in company with such an
historian as Tacitus and Roman officials of the stature of Pliny and
Suetonius, make the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth as certain as
that of any outstanding figure of antiquity. This evidence is worth
considering.
6.
Lucian
Lucian was a second century Greek satirist. Lucian spoke rather derisively of Jesus and early Christians. His point was to criticize Christians for being such gullible people that with very little warrant they would approve charlatans who pose as teachers thereby supporting these people and making them wealthy. In the process of his critique he relates some important points concerning Jesus and the Christians.
|
Ancient Secular Philosopher Lucian of Samosata "The Christians, you know worship a man to this day__the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account.....You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self devotion which are so common among them and it was impressed on the by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece and worship the crucified sage, and live after His laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property. |
Here is what we can know from Lucian!
1. We are told that Jesus was worshiped by all Christians.
2. It is also related that Jesus introduced new teachings in Palestine (the location given in another unquoted section)
3. That Jesus was crucified because of these teachings.
4. Jesus taught His followers certain doctrines such as: "all believers are brothers."
5. From the moment that conversion takes place.
6. After the false gods are denied (such as those of Greece). Additionally, these teachings included :
7. Worshiping Jesus and
8. Living according to His laws
9. Lucian refers to Jesus as a "sage" which in the context of a Greek means he is on the order of a philosopher.
10. Christians are followers of Christ.
11. The believe themselves to be immortal.
12. Christians accepted the teachings of Jesus by faith.
13. They practiced their faith by their disregard for material possessions. They had all things in common.
14. The Christians had "sacred writings" which were frequently read.
15. When something affected their group (community) they spared no trouble or expense to resolve the problem.
16.
However, Lucian notes that Christians were easily taken advantage of.
Home
by
Lane Rogers
Index
Lesson
Two