The Evidence for Christ from Secular History
                          by Lane Rogers

JESUS AND HISTORY

"Christianity, far from being a philosophy or merely some ethical system, is pre-eminently a redemptive system. It is belief in Christ as the son of God who will redeem us from sin and raise us from the dead to an eternal judgment. Thus an investigation into the genuineness of the claims of the Christian religion must begin with the historical reality of Jesus, for apart from Jesus redemption from sin and a resurrection from the grave become mere "pie in the sky by and by."

The quote is originally from Ed Wharton's Case for Historic Christianity__We used some of his material for a starting point and we are thankful to him for his many years of hard work on this subject.


I. A SMALL SAMPLING OF THE EVIDENCE FOR THE HISTORICAL JESUS.
A. FROM PAGAN SOURCES


1. Thallus. A Samaritan born historian named Thallus lived and worked in Rome about the middle of the first century. (c.52 A.D). Though his works are lost to us, Julius Africanus, a writer of the early third century, was familiar with Thallus' history of Greece. Africanus in commenting on the darkness which fell over the land during the crucifixion (Mark 15:33) said that, "Thallus, in the third book of his histories, explains away the darkness as an eclipse of the sun. " Will Durant observed that Thallus' argument took the existence of Christ for granted." The chief point in this reference to Thallus lies in the fact that a knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Jesus' death were well known in the imperial city of Rome as early as the middle of the first century. The fact of Christ's crucifixion was already common knowledge by that time, even to the extent that unbelievers like Thallus thought it necessary to explain the matter of the darkness as a natural phenomenon. But the never denied the darkness as a fact. The late Will Durant summed up the matter of Christ's historical existence by stating that it simply never occurred to the early opponents of Christianity to deny the existence of Jesus.

Early Christian use of Thallus

Sextus Julius Africanus was a Christian traveller and historian of the late 2nd and early 3rd century AD. It is in his works Thallus is mentioned. 

"On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by and earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, "Thallus calls this darkness an eclipse of the Sun in the third book of his Histories, without reason it seems to me."

This is also mentioned by the 9th century Christian chronologer George Syncellus who cites Sextus Julius Africanus as writing in reference to the darkness mentioned in the synoptic gospels as occurring at the death of Jesus:

Africanus then goes on to point out that an eclipse cannot occur at Passover when the moon is full and therefore diametrically opposite the Sun.

In this brief statement Thallus refers to Jesus' crucifixion and we may ascertain that:

1. The Christian Gospel or at least an account of the crucifixion was known in the Mediterranean region by the middle of the first century AD. This brings to mind the presence of Christian teachings in Rome mentioned by Tacitus and Suetonius.

2. There was widespread darkness in the land, implied to have taken place at the time of Jesus' crucifixion.

3. Unbelievers offered rationalistic explanations for certain Christian teachings or for supernatural claims not long after their initial proclamation.


2. Mara-Bar-Serapion. A manuscript in the British Museum preserves the text of a letter written some time after 73 AD. It was sent by a Syrian named Mara-Bar-Serapion to his son, Serapion. In prison at the time of the writing the father pleads for his son to be wise by illustrating the folly of persecuting such wise men as Socrates, Pythagoras, and Christ:

"What advantage did the Athenians gain form putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as a judgment for their crime. What advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise king? It was just after that their kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the Athenias died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea; the Jews ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion. But Socrates did not die for good; he lived on in the teaching of Plato. Pythagoras did not die for good; he lived on in the statue of Hera. Nor did the wise King die for good; he lived on in the teaching which he had given.
It is obvious that by the time of this writing, Jesus was already placed on equal footing with the accepted wise men of the ancient world.

A Letter of Mara, Son of Serapion.1
------------
Mara, son of Serapion, to Serapion, my son: peace.
When thy master and guardian wrote me a letter, and informed me that thou wast very diligent in study,
though so young in years, I blessed God that thou, a little boy, and without a guide to direct thee, hadst begun in good earnest; and to myself also this was a comfort-that I heard of thee, little boy as thou art, as displaying such greatness of mind and conscientiousness:2 a character which, in the case of many who have begun well, has shown no eagerness to continue.
On this account, lo, I have written for thee this record,
touching that which I have by careful observation discovered in the world. For the kind of life men lead has been carefully observed by me. I tread the path of learning,3 and from the study of Greek philosophy4 have I found out all these things, although they suffered shipwreck when the birth of life took place.5
Be diligent, then, my son, in
attention to those things which are becoming for the free,6 so as to devote thyself to learning, and to follow after wisdom; and endeavour thus to become confirmed in those habits with which thou hast begun. Call to mind also my precepts, as a quiet person who is fond of the pursuit of learning. And, even though such a life should seem to thee very irksome, yet when thou hast made experience of it for a little while, it will become very pleasant to thee: for to me also it so happened. When, moreover, a person has left his home, and is able still to preserve his previous character, and properly does that which it behoves him to do, he is that chosen man who is called "the blessing of God," and one who does not find aught else to compare with his freedom.7 For, as for those persons who are called to the pursuit of learning, they are seeking to extricate themselves from the turmoils of time; and those who take hold upon wisdom, they are clinging to the hope of righteousness; and those who take their stand on truth, they are displaying the banner of their virtue; and those who cultivate philosophy, they are looking to escape from the vexations of the world. And do thou too, my son, thus wisely behave thyself in regard to these things, as a wise person who seeks to spend a pure life; and beware lest the gain which many hunger after enervate thee, and thy mind turn to covet riches, which have no stability. For, when they are acquired by fraud, they do not continue; nor, even when justly obtained, do they last; and all those things which are seen by thee in the world, as belonging to that which is only for a little time, are destined to depart like a dream: for they are but as the risings and settings of the seasons.
About the
objects of that vainglory, too, of which the life of men is full, be not thou solicitous: seeing that from those things which give us joy there quickly comes to us harm. Most especially is this the case with the birth of beloved children. For in two respects it plainly brings us harm: in the case of the virtuous, our very affection for them torments us, and from their very excellence of character we Suffer torture; and, in the case of the vicious, we are worried with their correction, and afflicted with their misconduct.
Thou hast heard,
8 moreover, concerning our companions, that, when they were leaving Samosata, they were distressed about it, and, as if complaining of the time in which their lot was cast, said thus: "We are now far removed from our home, and we cannot return again to our city, or behold our people, or offer to our gods the greeting of praise." Meet was it that that day should be called a day of lamentation, because one heavy grief possessed them all alike. For they wept as they remembered their fathers, and they thought of their mothers9 with sobs, and they were distressed for their brethren, and grieved for their betrothed whom they had left behind. And, although we had heard that their10 former companions were proceeding to Seleucia, we clandestinely set out, and proceeded on the way towards them, and united our own misery with theirs. Then was our grief exceedingly violent, and fitly did our weeping abound, by reason of our desperate plight, and our wailing gathered itself into a dense cloud,11 and our misery grew raster than a mountain: for not one of us had the power to ward off the disasters that assailed him. For affection for the living was intense, as well as sorrow for the dead, and our miseries were driving us on without any way of escape. For we saw our brethren and our children captives, and we remembered our deceased companions, who were laid to rest in a foreign12 land. Each one of us, too, was anxious for himself, lest he should have disaster added to disaster, or lest another calamity should overtake that which went before it. What enjoyment could men have that were prisoners, and who experienced things like these?
But as for thee, my beloved, be not distressed because in thy loneliness thou hast
13 been driven from place to place. For to these things men are born, since they are destined to meet with the accidents of time. But rather let thy thought be this, that to wise men every place is alike, and that in every city the good have many fathers and mothers. Else, if thou doubt it, take thee a proof from what thou hast seen thyself. How many people who know thee not love thee as one of their own children; and what a host of women receive thee as they would their own beloved ones! Verily, as a stranger thou hast been fortunate; verily, for thy small love many people have conceived an ardent affection for thee.
What, again, are we to say concerning the delusion
14 which has taken up its abode in the world? Both by reason of toil15 painful is the journey through it, and by its agitations are we, like a reed by the force of the wind, bent now in this direction, now in that. For I have been amazed at many who cast away their children, and I have been astonished at others who bring up those that are not theirs. There are persons who acquire riches in the world, and I have also been astonished at others who inherit that which is not of their own acquisition. Thus mayest thou understand and see that we are walking under the guidance of delusion.
Begin and tell us, O wisest of men,
16 on which of his possessions a man can place reliance, or concerning what things he can say that they are such as abide. Wilt thou say so of abundance of riches? they are snatched away. Of fortresses? they are spoiled. Of cities? they are laid waste. Of greatness? it is brought down. Of magnificence? it is overthrown. Of beauty? it withers. Or of laws? they pass away. Or of poverty? it is despised. Or of children? they die. Or of friends? they prove false. Or of the praises of men? jealousy goes before them.
Let a man, therefore, rejoice in his empire, like Darius; or in his good fortune, like Polycrates; or in his bravery, like Achilles; or in his wife, like Agamemnon; or in his offspring, like Priam; or in his skill, like Archimedes; or in his wisdom, like Socrates; or in his learning, like Pythagoras; or in his ingenuity, like Palamedes;-the life of men, my son, departs from the world, but their praises and their virtues abide for ever.
Do thou, then, my little son, choose thee that which fadeth not away. For those who occupy themselves with these things are called modest, and
are beloved, and lovers of a good name.
When, moreover, anything untoward befalls thee, do not lay the blame on man, nor be angry against God, nor fulminate against the time thou livest in.
If thou shalt continue in this mind, thy gift it not small which thou hast received from God, which has no need of riches, and is never reduced to poverty. For without fear shalt thou pass thy life,
17 and with rejoicing. For fear and apologies for one's nature belong not to the wise, but to such as walk contrary to law. For no man has even been deprived of his wisdom, as of his property.
Follow diligently learning rather than riches. For the greater are
one's possessions, the greater is the evil attendant upon them. For I have myself observed that, where a man's goods are many, so also are the tribulations which happen to him; and, where luxuries are accumulated, there also do sorrows congregate; and, where riches are abundant, there is stored up the bitterness of many a year.
If, therefore, thou shalt behave with understanding, and shalt diligently watch over
thy conduct, God will not refrain from helping thee, nor men from loving thee.
Let that which thou art able to acquire suffice thee; and if, moreover, thou art able to do without property, thou shale be called blessed, and no man whatsover shall be jealous of thee.
And remember also this, that nothing will disturb thy life very greatly, except
it be the love of gain; and that no man after his death is called an owner of property: because it is by the desire of this that weak men are led captive, and they know not that a man dwells among his possessions only in the manner of a chance-comer, and they are haunted with fear because these possessions are not secured to them: for they abandoned that which is their own, and seek that which is not theirs.
What are we to say, when the wise are dragged by force by the hands of tyrants, and their wisdom is deprived of its freedom
18 by slander, and they are plundered for their superior intelligence, without the opportunity of making a defence? They are not wholly to be pitied. For what benefit did the Athenians obtain by putting Socrates to death, seeing that they received as retribution for it famine and pestilence? Or the people of Samos by the burning of Pythagoras, seeing that in one hour the. whole19 of their country was covered with sand? Or the Jews by the murder of their Wise King, seeing that from that very time their kingdom was driven away from them? For with justice did God grant a recompense to the wisdom of all three of them. For the Athenians died by famine; and the people of Samos were covered by the sea without remedy; and the Jews, brought to desolation and expelled from their kingdom, are driven away into Every land. Nay, Socrates did "not" die, because of Plato; nor yet Pythagoras, because of the statue of Hera; nor yet the Wise King, because of the new laws which he enacted.
Moreover I, my son, have attentively observed mankind, in what a dismal state of ruin they are. And I have been amazed that they are not utterly prostrated
20 by the calamities which surround them, and that even their wars21 are not enough for them, nor the pains they endure, nor the diseases, nor the death, nor the poverty; but that, like savage beasts, they must needs rush upon one another in their enmity, trying which of them shall inflict the greater mischief on his fellow. For they have broken away from the bounds of truth, and transgress all honest laws, because they are bent on fulfilling their selfish desires; for, whensoever a man is eagerly set on obtaining that which he desires, how is it possible that he should fitly do that which it behoves him to do? and they acknowledge no restraint,22 and but seldom stretch out their hands towards truth and goodness, but in their manner of life behave like the deaf23 and the blind. Moreover, the wicked rejoice, and the righteous are disquieted. He that has, denies that he has; and he that has not, struggles to acquire. The poor seek help, and the rich hide their wealth, and every man laughs at his fellow. Those that are drunken are stupefied, and those that have recovered themselves are ashamed.24 Some weep, and some sing; and some laugh, and others are a prey to care. They rejoice in things evil, and a man that speaks the truth they despise.
Should a man, then, be surprised when the world is seeking to wither him with
its scorn, seeing that they and he have not one and the same manner of life? "These" are the things for which they care. One of them is looking forward to the time when in battle he shah obtain the renown of victory; yet the valiant perceive not by how many foolish objects of desire a man is led captive in the world. But would that for a little while self-repentance visited them! For, while victorious by their bravery, they are overcome by the power of covetousness. For I have made trial of men, and with this result: that the one thing on which they are intent, is abundance of riches. Therefore also it is that they have no settled purpose; but, through the instability of their minds, a man is of a sudden cast down from his elation of spirit to be swallowed up with sadness. They look not at the vast wealth of eternity, nor consider that every visitation of trouble is conducting us all alike to the same final period. For they are devoted to the majesty of the belly, that huge blot on the character of the vicious.
Moreover,
as regards this letter which it has come into my mind to write to thee, it is not enough to read it, but the best thing is that it be put in practice.25 For I know for myself, that when thou shale have made experiment of this mode of life, it will be very pleasant to thee, and thou wilt be free from sore vexation; because it is only on account of children that we tolerate riches.26
Put, therefore, sadness away from thee, O
most beloved of mankind,-a thing which never in anywise benefits a man; and drive care away from thee, which brings with it no advantage whatsoever. For we have no resource or skill that can avail us-nothing but a great mind able to cope with the disasters and to endure the tribulations which we are always receiving at the hands of the times. For at these things does it behove us to look, and not only at those which are fraught with rejoicing and good repute.
Devote thyself to wisdom, the fount of all things good, the treasure that faileth not. There shalt thou lay thy head, and be at ease. For this shall be to thee father and mother, and a good companion for thy life.
Enter into closest intimacy with fortitude and patience, those
virtues which are able successfully to encounter the tribulations that befall feeble men. For so great is their strength, that they are adequate to sustain hunger, and can endure thirst, and mitigate every trouble. With toil, moreover, yea even with dissolution, they make right merry.
To these things give diligent attention, and thou shalt lead an untroubled life, and I also Shall have comfort,
27 and thou shalt be called "the delight of his parents."
For in that time of yore, when our city was standing in her greatness, thou mayest be aware that against many persons
among us abominable words were uttered; but for ourselves,28 we acknowledged long ago that we received love, no less than honour, to the fullest extent from the multitude of her people: it was the state of the times only that forbade our completing those: things which we had resolved on doing.29 And here also in the prison-house we give thanks to God that we have received the love of many: for we are striving to our utmost to maintain a life of sobriety and cheerfulness;30 and, if anyone drive us by force, he will but be bearing public testimony against himself, that he is estranged from all things good, and he will receive disgrace and shame from the foul mark of shame that is upon him. For we have shown our truth-that truth which in our now ruined kingdom we possessed not.31 But, if the Romans shall permit us to go back to our own country, as called upon by justice and righteousness to do, they will be acting like humane men, and will earn the name of good and righteous, and at the same time will have a peaceful country in which to dwell: for they will exhibit their greatness when they shall leave us free men, and we shall be obedient to the sovereign power which the time has allotted to us. But let them not like tyrants, drive us as though we were slaves. Yet, if it has been already determined what shall be done, we shall receive nothing more dreadful than the peaceful death which is in store for us.
But thou, my little son, if thou resolve diligently to acquaint thyself with these things, first of all put a check on appetite, and set limits to that in which thou art
indulging. Seek the power to refrain from being angry; and, instead of yielding to outbursts of passion, listen to the promptings of kindness.
For myself, what I am henceforth solicitous about is this-
that, so far as I have recollections of the past, I may leave behind me a book containing them, and with a prudent mind finish the journey which I am appointed to take, and depart without suffering out of the sad afflictions of the world. For my prayer is, that I may receive my dismissal; and by what kind of death concerns me not. But, if any one should be troubled or anxious about this, I have no counsel to give him: for yonder, in the dwelling-place of all the world, will he find us before him.
One of his friends asked Mara, son of Serapion, when in bonds at his side: "Nay, by thy life, Mara, tell me what
cause of laughter thou hast seen, that thou laughest." "I am laughing," said Mara, "at Time:32 inasmuch as, although he has not borrowed any evil from me, he is paying me back."


1. From this letter we learn that Jesus was considered to be a wise and virtuous man.

2. He is addressed twice as the Jew's King, possibly a reference to Jesus' own teachings about Himself.

3. Jesus was executed unjustly by the Jews who paid (in part) for their misdeeds by suffering judgment shortly after (70 AD).

4. Jesus lived on in the teachings of early Christians which is an indication that Mara-Bar-Serapion was not a Christian.

5. The writer observed that the Destruction of Jerusalem was because the Jews killed the Christ, this from a pagan.



3. Cornelius Tacitus. Usually rated as the greatest historian of Rome, Tacitus (born c. 52-54 A.D.). When he was about the age of sixty while writing on the reign of Nero (54-68), told how the Christians were made scapegoats for the Great Fire of 64 A.D. It has been rumored that Nero himself started the fire in order to gain glory by rebuilding the city.
Here is a full quote of the cite of our concern, from Annals 15.44. Jesus and the Christians are mentioned in an account of how the Emperor Nero went after Christians in order to draw attention away from himself after Rome's fire of 64 AD:

"Such indeed were the precautions of human wisdom. The next thing was to seek means of propitiating the gods, and recourse was had to the Sibylline books, by the direction of which prayers were offered to Vulcanus, Ceres, and Proserpina. Juno, too, was entreated by the matrons, first, in the Capitol, then on the nearest part of the coast, whence water was procured to sprinkle the fane and image of the goddess. And there were sacred banquets and nightly vigils celebrated by married women. But all human efforts, all the lavish gifts of the emperor, and the propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the conflagration was the result of an order.
Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man's cruelty, that they were being destroyed."

To the pagan Tacitus, "Christus" was more than likely a proper name. Tacitus was in a good position to learn of Christianity, being governor of Asia in 112 A.D.  However there are several things we can know about Jesus from the above quote.
1.  Christians were named for their founder, Christus (from the Latin)
2.  Who was put to death by Roman procurator Pontius Pilate (also Latin)
3.  During the reign of emperor Tiberius (AD 14-37)
4.  His death ended the "superstition" for a short time.
5.  But it broke out again (try Acts chapter 2)
6.  Especially in Judaea, where the teachings had their origin
7.  His followers carried the doctrine to Rome (the apostle Paul and company)
8.  When the great fire destroyed a large part of Rome during the reign of Nero (AD 54-68)
9.  Tacitus reports that this group was hated for its abominations
10. These Christians were arrested after pleading guilty
11.  Many were convicted for the hatred of mankind
12.  They were mocked and then
13.  Then tortured, including being "nailed to crosses" or burnt to death
14.  Because of these actions, people had compassion for the Christians
15.  Tacitus therefore concluded that such punishments were not for the public good but were simply "to glut one man's cruelty."

Since Tacitus was a government official he no doubt received his material from government records. It may have even been Pilate's letter to the emperor. We should also not the historical context. The death of Jesus is linked both to Pilate and Tiberius therefore confirming the biblical account. One other point that should be noticed. Tacitus may have referred to the resurrection of Jesus indirectly since he mentioned that his teachings "again broke out" after his death.
There is another reference to Jesus in the Histories but the works are lost. The reference is preserved by Sulpicus Severus. He informs us that Tacitus wrote of the burning of the Jerusalem Temple by the Romans in 70 AD, an event that destroyed the city. The "Christians" are mentioned as a group that are connected with the event.



4. C. Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Younger). Pliny the governor of Bithynia, often wrote to the Emperor Trajan asking his Imperial advice on how best to deal with the sect of the Christians which according to him were troubling his province. One letter (c. 112 AD) reveals information he extracted from some Christians by torture:

Medieval Sourcebook:
Pliny on the Christians and Trajan's Answer


Pliny the Younger was governor of Pontus/Bithynia from 111-113 AD. We have a whole set of exchanges of his letters with the emperor Trajan on a variety of administrative political matters. These two letters are the most famous, in which P. encounters Christianity for the first time.
PLINY, LETTERS 10.96-97
Pliny to the Emperor Trajan
It is my practice, my lord, to refer to you all matters concerning which I am in doubt. For who can better give guidance to my hesitation or inform my ignorance? I have never participated in trials of Christians. I therefore do not know what offenses it is the practice to punish or investigate, and to what extent. And I have been not a little hesitant as to whether there should be any distinction on account of age or no difference between the very young and the more mature; whether pardon is to be granted for repentance, or, if a man has once been a Christian, it does him no good to have ceased to be one; whether the name itself, even without offenses, or only the offenses associated with the name are to be punished.
Meanwhile, in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered executed. For I had no doubt that, whatever the nature of their creed, stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy surely deserve to be punished. There were others possessed of the same folly; but because they were Roman citizens, I signed an order for them to be transferred to Rome.
Soon accusations spread, as usually happens, because of the proceedings going on, and several incidents occurred. An anonymous document was published containing the names of many persons. Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ.
They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food--but ordinary and innocent food. Even this, they affirmed, they had ceased to do after my edict by which, in accordance with your instructions, I had forbidden political associations. Accordingly, I judged it all the more necessary to find out what the truth was by torturing two female slaves who were called deaconesses. But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition.
I therefore postponed the investigation and hastened to consult you. For the matter seemed to me to warrant consulting you, especially
because of the number involved. For many persons of every age, every rank, and also of both sexes are and will be endangered. For the contagion of this superstition has spread not only to the cities but also to the villages and farms. But it seems possible to check and cure it. It is certainly quite clear that the temples, which had been almost deserted, have begun to be frequented, that the established religious rites, long neglected, are being resumed, and that from everywhere sacrificial animals are coming, for which until now very few purchasers could be found. Hence it is easy to imagine what a multitude of people can be reformed if an opportunity for repentance is afforded.
Trajan to Pliny
You observed proper procedure, my dear Pliny, in sifting the cases of those who had been denounced to you as Christians. For it is not possible to lay down any general rule to serve as a kind of fixed standard. They are not to be sought out; if they are denounced and proved guilty, they are to be punished, with this reservation, that whoever denies that he is a Christian and really proves it--that is, by worshiping our gods--even though he was under suspicion in the past, shall obtain pardon through repentance. But anonymously posted accusations ought to have no place in any prosecution. For this is both a dangerous kind of precedent and out of keeping with the spirit of our age.
[I was unsure of the origin of this file. Bob Edsall (redsall@voicenet.com) informs me that is originates with James O'Donnell's (jod@ccat.sas.upenn.edu) file at http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/jod/texts/pliny.html]

Ten books of Pliny's correspondence are extant today. The tenth book was written around 112 AD. In this book we notice that Pliny found that Christian influences were so strong that pagan temples had been nearly deserted, pagan festivals severely decreased and the sacrificial animals had few buyers. Because of the Christians inflexibility and the emperor's prohibition against political associations Pliny took action. Yet, he was not all that sure as to how he ought to deal with these people. Pliny wants to know if repentance should make any difference in how they are punished.

Pliny dealt with the Christians personally. He interrogated them wanting to know if they were believers. If they answered in the affirmative he asked them two more times under the threat of death. If they continued firm in their belief, he ordered the executed. It might also be mentioned that it is Pliny who gives the modern feminist movement their ammunition by referring to two women "deaconesses" who he arrested. Never mind that his theological understanding of these terms was completely absent even to the point of accusing those participating in the Lord's Supper of being cannibals. (They were eating flesh and drinking blood) I am sure that Pliny had a firm grasp on what is a deacon and elder in the church with his advanced theological background in Christianity. the term "deaconesses" simply means servants. Of course you realize that I am poking fun at those people who embrace such a silly idea.

If the person was a Roman citizen they were sent to the Emperor in Rome for trial. If they denied being a Christian or had disavowed their faith in the past they "repeated after me an invocation to the gods, and offered adoration...to YOUR IMAGE" (Trajan's image). Then they were allowed to "curse Christ." Pliny explained that the purpose of this was so that multitudes may be reclaimed from error.

Here are a few things we can learn from Pliny's letter:

1. Christ was worshiped as a deity by early believers.

2. Pliny refers late in his letter to the teachings of Jesus and His followers as "excessive superstition" and "contagious superstition." This reminds us of Tacitus and Suetonius.

3. Jesus' ethical teachings are reflected in the oath taken by Christians never to be guilty of a number of sins mentioned in the letter.

4. We find a probable reference to the institution of the Lord's Supper and the celebration of the "love feast," in Pliny's remark about their "regathering" to take common food. The reference here alludes to the accusation of the part of non-Christian believers that the believers were guilty of ritual murder and drinking blood during these meetings again, a veiled reference to the Lord's Supper.

5. There is also the mention that Christians meet on a "certain day" Was this Sunday?

6. We see Pliny's method of dealing with believers, from their identification, to their interrogation, to their execution.

7. Interestingly, Pliny reports that "true believers" could not be forced to worship the gods or the emperor!

8. Christian worship involved a "pre-dawn" service.

9. It included "singing hymns" and the early time meant there was a normal working day ahead.

10. Those Christians probably formed a typical cross-section of society in Bithynia since they were off all classes, races and sexes.

What we know from above is that believers were meeting on a regular basis and worshiping Jesus.

In Trajan's response we learn:

1. Christians should not be sought out or tracked down.

2. Repentance coupled with worship of the gods sufficed to clear a person. Pliny expressed doubts as to whether a person should be punished in spite of repentance and only recounts the pardoning of persons who had willingly given up their beliefs prior to questioning.

3. Pliny was not to honor any list of Christians which were given to him if the accuser did not name himself.

It is worth noticing in passing that the Emperor Trajan and the Emperor Hadrian both are reliable sources for the existence of early Christianity and its beliefs.



5. Suetonius. During the reign of Hadrian Suetonius was annalist and court official of the Imperial House. About 120 AD he wrote his Life of Claudius, from which is taken his most often quoted reference:

"As the Jews were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Christus, he expelled them from Rome." Nero 16

Since so many Jews had become Christians at Rome, Claudius probably equated the Jews with Christians and thus expelled them from Rome by Imperial decree. Luke, by the way records this same event much earlier in Acts 18:1-2. The second reference from Suetonius is again to the Christians who were tortured under Nero:

"After the great fire at Rome....Punishments were also inflicted on the Christians, a sect professing a new and mischievous religious belief. "

There are a few facts that we can glean from Suetonius.

1. The first relates the the expulsion of the Jews from Rome but also relates to the claim that

2. It was Christ who caused the Jews to make the uproar in Rome, apparently by His teachings. The second reference is quite similar to the longer statement by Tacitus.

3. Including the use of the word "mischievous"

4. He uses the term "Christians" to identify this group as followers of Christ.

After referring to these same pagan writers as evidence of the historical Jesus, Will Durant says,

"These references prove the existence of Christians rather than Christ; but unless we assume the latter we are driven to the improbable hypothesis that Jesus was invented in one generation; moreover, we must suppose that the Christian community in Rome had been established some years before 52 AD, to merit the attention of an imperial decree.
This evidence especially in company with such an historian as Tacitus and Roman officials of the stature of Pliny and Suetonius, make the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth as certain as that of any outstanding figure of antiquity. This evidence is worth considering.



6.  Lucian

Lucian was a second century Greek satirist. Lucian spoke rather derisively of Jesus and early Christians. His point was to criticize Christians for being such gullible people that with very little warrant they would approve charlatans who pose as teachers thereby supporting these people and making them wealthy. In the process of his critique he relates some important points concerning Jesus and the Christians.

Ancient Secular Philosopher Lucian of Samosata

"The Christians, you know worship a man to this day__the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account.....You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self devotion which are so common among them and it was impressed on the by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece and worship the crucified sage, and live after His laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property.

Here is what we can know from Lucian!

1. We are told that Jesus was worshiped by all Christians.

2. It is also related that Jesus introduced new teachings in Palestine (the location given in another unquoted section)

3. That Jesus was crucified because of these teachings.

4. Jesus taught His followers certain doctrines such as: "all believers are brothers."

5. From the moment that conversion takes place.

6. After the false gods are denied (such as those of Greece). Additionally, these teachings included :

7. Worshiping Jesus and

8. Living according to His laws

9. Lucian refers to Jesus as a "sage" which in the context of a Greek means he is on the order of a philosopher.

10. Christians are followers of Christ.

11. The believe themselves to be immortal.

12. Christians accepted the teachings of Jesus by faith.

13. They practiced their faith by their disregard for material possessions. They had all things in common.

14. The Christians had "sacred writings" which were frequently read.

15. When something affected their group (community) they spared no trouble or expense to resolve the problem.

16. However, Lucian notes that Christians were easily taken advantage of.

Home                                                                                                                      
by Lane Rogers
Index
Lesson Two